Camouflage
|
English Title: Camouflage Original Title: Barwy Ochronne Country of Origin: Poland Studio: Film Polski, Zespól Filmowy “Tor”, Polish Director: Krzysztof Zanussi Producer(s): Tadeusz Drewno Screenplay: Krzysztof Zanussi Cinematographer: Edward Kłosiński Editor: Urszula Śliwińska Runtime: 106 minutes Genre: Drama Language: Polish Starring/Cast: Zbigniew Zapasiewicz, Piotr Garlicki, Christine Paul-Podlasky, Mariusz Dmochowski Year: 1977 Volume: East European |
|
|
Synopsis: Teaching assistant Jaroslaw Kruszynski accepts a late entry for a student academic conference and competition. Professor Jakub Szelestowski warns him that their university chancellor, and Jakub’s future thesis director, despises the paper’s supervisor, and had made arrangements behind the scenes for him not to be invited as he used to denounce students and professors during the strongest communist repressions, and in addition plagiarized his doctoral thesis. Jaroslaw refuses to believe in dishonesty. The students understand the shenanigans, show enthusiasm for the debatable paper, and Jarek secures a special-mention award for it. When the chancellor appears not to mind, Jarolsaw calls it a demonstration of his own capacity to live for the truth and of Jakub’s twisted life and view of their world. The student comes drunk to the award ceremony and bites the chancellor after he hands him the award. Jarrolsaw fails to prevent the chancellor from calling the police, with the latter then leaving the conference in anger as tensions rise between Jakub and Jaroslaw. Critique:
Zanussi’s declared intent to show Jakub rejecting conscience and enduring human values – a common interpretation of the character – is equivocated by the dialogue. Partly out of concern about censorship, the script never demonstrates the veracity of Jakub’s knowledge of the chancellor’s/authorities’ fraudulence that is supposed to protect him (he weasels out each time he could provide Jaroslaw with evidence). Zbigniew Zapasiewicz’s highly praised, largely unrehearsed performance also strengthens this aspect of the film – for the most part he made roundtrips to the location about an hour out of Warsaw just to shoot a scene, while acting in the theatre at the same time and, similar to his role, working as a college dean. In the less routine reading, Jaroslaw starts with dishonesty by wrongly accepting a paper and continues to lie to himself about his apparent un-involvement in the moral decay of their world, while Jakub’s description of it would not have come about if his actions were indeed as cynical as his understanding of their world. Jakub undermines his own thesis about the naturalistic survival instinct by making himself vulnerable to the danger of being denounced to the communist authorities. Jakub’s (and the film’s) exposition of the realities of life under communism delivers itself as part of society’s hope for a moral renaissance should the opportunity arise. Without people like Jakub, Jaroslaw (and society in general) would live with an illusion of morality while descending into the practical cynicism exposed by this character, and would do so without a prospect to alter things if he sees nothing wrong with society and does not know how to bring about moral change in the isolated instances when he observes he should. Mentors like Jakub were able to recognize the cynicism of their world through their moral conscience ‘formed under different circumstances’, as Jakub, a camouflaged messenger from pre-communist times, says at one point. What Jakub sees needs now to be passed on to the generation already born under communism, as the West (embodied by Nelly and the Italian tourist with whom she has sex) withdraws to its insular gratifications after having peeked in and gained no further insight into people’s realities under oppression than Nelly’s vacuous assertion that ‘it does not make sense’. |
|
|
Author of this review: Martin Votruba |
|